Sakineh – International Response

http://www.cnn.com/2010/WORLD/meast/07/24/iran.stoning.protest/index.html#fbid=z2DpimzBm5z

CNN reports this morning on world wide protests against the sentence to death by stoning handed down to Sakineh, and 9-15 others in prison in Iran. One can only hope that continual pressure from the international community will end this abhorrent practice and bring some semblance of justice to the Iranian judicial system.

The Iranian people abhor this practice so much that the stonings are no longer held in public, but carried out in secrecy. Military men cast the stones, led by an official from the Judiciary or a Mullah. Cowards and barbarians all.

Sign the petition at http://freesakineh.org

Canadian Census–2

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/why-the-census-matters-just-about-everywhere/article1650524/

This article in the Globe and Mail this am attempts to define the importance of the census to everyone. What interests me is that the Prime Minister, who controls just about everything that goes on in the government, didn’t either know this – and he’s an economist by education – or is so ideologically driven that it doesn’t matter to him. The census has been in place officially in the areas formerly under British control on a recurring basis since 1841. The US does their census on the 10’s and is even older. A census is  not a survey or a poll. It’s a counting procedure and is vital to almost everyone who has to make a decision based on fact not imagination.

Or perhaps that’s the problem, all those uncomfortable facts.

Sakineh

Iran stoning case woman ordered to name campaigners | World news | The Guardian.

Sakineh is apparently still alive and being questioned, one fears tortured, so that her jailers may know the names of those who are coordinating the campaign to save her. As well, according to the article in the Guardian, her sons are being warned to keep silent. The message to the jailers has to be that there are hundreds of thousands of us, all independent. Heather Reisman initiated the campaign here, but now it has a life of its own. No coordination, just people who believe that the barbarism has to stop. Please sign the petition. http://freesakineh.org

Census Lost

Statistics Canada chief falls on sword over census – The Globe and Mail.

The headline above suggests the the Chief Statistician resigned because he did something wrong. At least that is my understanding of the phrase “fall on your sword”. In fact he resigned because Minister Clement, and of course Prime Minister Harper in that tightly controlled cabinet, placed him in an untenable position. Clement said that he, Mr. Sheikh supported the government position because he had given them the options. Today Mr. Sheikh said that the suggested voluntary long form cannot replace the mandatory short. He said this in the fewest possible words. “It cannot.” Then he resigned.

I’m no longer sure what this core support group is that the Tories are pandering to. The opposition to this move in the census is drawn from the widest cross-section of citizenry that I can recall, including: powerful business groups; provinces; social, education and welfare planners; and ordinary citizens like me, who think we need to have an OBJECTIVE measure of how we’re  doing as a country. The census tells us who we are, what the health issues are and where they are, what are the educational needs, how much money is being made and who’s making it and how. In short it gives us the facts, without the government spin. If you want to be told only what the government wants you to hear, whatever its political stripe, then you won’t care about this change. If, like me, you want to know what is happening to our country, then object. Write to your MP; write to the paper; consider  with care your vote in the next election.

Saving Sakineh

Iran’s Sakineh Be Stoned Possibly Today: Despite Total Lack of Evidence :: Hudson New York.

The article above states the belief that the death sentence for Sakineh may have taken place as early as yesterday. Nothing in the press today to confirm that outcome. The writer believes that the execution of Sakineh and all the others jailed and condemned to stoning may happen quickly to decrease the bad press Iran is receiving. I think the even if Sakineh is not saved, the international campaign must continue, to prevent this happening to all the others in the same situation in Iran. Please sign the petition at http://freesakineh.org

The Canadian Census

Topic : Canada Census – thestar.com.

The Star this morning has a list of recent articles within its pages on the subject of the 2011 census. Many of the arguments in favour of retaining the long-form census in its present form, with the mandatory aspect, come from the folks who depend on its information to design everything from the next red hot gadget to policies governing higher education and hospitals. Young people planning a career can search for information about job prospects and health care managers on the population trends within their area. Do they need more nursery bassinets  or nursing homes?
What about power needs? The Conservatives say the state has no business asking you how many bedrooms are in your house? Do you know a better way to judge the size of a house, and its likely power requirements?

I’ve been an amateur genealogist for some years now. Long enough to have endured the privacy commissioner’s decision, now retracted, to disallow all future access to census data for genealogical purposes. It was to have begun with the 1911 census but both that and the 1916 are available online. At least, the information from the short form is.

At this time genealogy is a popular pastime. Television programs such as Who Do You Think You Are and Ancestors in the Attic have loyal followings. Future genealogists however will find their past locked away in the vaults, even if their ancestors, us, filled out the forms.

Trivial you say? Perhaps. The need for information in all government departments, in industry, in social and educational planning is not. I think it is important that we understand the make-up of our country. In short, how we are doing? The census, in place in all countries in the sphere of the British Empire since 1841, has been the source of reliable information. Why is the government so intent on fixing what isn’t broken?

Oh, and don’t tell us people have complained. Not according to StatsCan, or the privacy commissioner. We know that’s a conservative  American problem, not ours. As usual, Tories pandering to their base support and their heroes across the border.

Facts are so troublesome. No wonder the Tories don’t want us to have access to them. We might understand just how incompetent and ideologically driven they are.

Will I fill out my long form if I get one? Yes indeed. Not because I think the government has chosen the right path, but because I want future information to be as accurate as possible in the circumstances. And that will introduce my bias into their data.

Saving Sakineh

It’s a crime to be a woman in Iran – The Globe and Mail.

Margaret Wendt’s excellent column in the Globe this morning goes beyond telling us Sakineh’s story to that of the many women killed and imprisoned by this regime.

Sakineh matters; one person matters; all of the people awaiting death for this non-crime matter. Please sign the petition. The madmen in charge of Iran appear to have some response to the world’s outrage. Make them hear you.

http://freesakineh.org/

Authors’ Rights

The Government of Canada is proposing changes to the Copyright Act which will decrease the income, small as it is, of authors in this country. The exemption for education users works this way: the school buys one or two copies of a work, then photocopies portions it wishes to use, or indeed the entire work. Up to now, the school would have to buy a license to do so, a portion of which goes the the author. The details are in the following excerpt from the Canadian Authors Association newsletter ( used with permission.)

“CAA Joins Writers’ Coalition On Copyright Reform
Six leading professional organizations representing Canadian writers and translators have formed a coalition to ensure that proposed legislation to reform Canadian copyright law will respect our rights, including the right to be fairly remunerated for our work. We will be working together to engage our members to support appropriate  amendments to C-32, the government bill that was given first reading in Parliament on June 2nd.
The Writers’ Union of Canada, the Professional Writers Association of Canada, the Playwrights Guild of Canada, the League of Canadian Poets, the Canadian Authors Association and the Literary Translators Association of Canada will work together through the summer and fall to advise politicians and civil servants on required changes to the legislation under consideration. The six associations represent over 4000 professional writers and translators.
CAA is also participating in a wider coalition led by the Canadian Copyright Institute that includes associations from all the creator sectors. We will be sending you further information about these issues, and we also want your feedback and your concerns. This process is very important to all of us as we hope it will influence the outcome of Bill C-32. We look forward to future dialogue with you.
In the meantime, here are some facts about the proposed copyright legislation and how it affects writers and publishers:
What’s wrong with Bill C-32?
Canadian writers and other creators will suffer hardship under C-32
The average income of a Canadian writer is only $16,000 – that’s less than minimum wage;
Most Canadian publishers operate on very slim margins; their sustainability is often fragile;
Canada’s creators and publishers need all the income their works can generate. Their sustainability is threatened when income is taken away;
Only some of the income from a book or other copyright protected work is generated when it is sold. Other revenues are earned when instead of buying more copies of a book, a school or other institution reproduces pages of the original. To get permission to make copies without infringing copyright, they purchase Collective Licenses, income from which flows back to creators and publishers just like royalties from sales;
By exempting educational users and others from the requirement to get collective licenses, C-32 will cost Canadian creators and publishers as much as $30 million a year in license income alone.
C-32 violates core principles of Copyright Law
Copyright exists to protect producers and creators. When others use our works, copyright law should ensure the people who worked so hard to produce them are compensated;
C-32 expropriates creators and publishers in the name of the public interest; but no other supplier to the educational sector – whether makers of desks or computers or the teachers in the classroom – are forced to work for free!
What you can do to fix Bill C-32:
Help ensure Canadian creators are heard. Raise our concerns with your colleagues, in caucus, and in the House of Commons;
Build bridges with like-minded members of other parties to protect Canadian creators from unfair and arbitrary expropriation;
Protect Canada’s place in the new digital economy by supporting amendments to C-32 that – without hardship to consumers –  ensure Canada’s creators suffer no hardship. Creators of content need to derive benefit from their work. The vitality of Canadian culture in the global digital economy depends on it!

CAA Joins Writers’ Coalition On Copyright ReformSix leading professional organizations representing Canadian writers and translators have formed a coalition to ensure that proposed legislation to reform Canadian copyright law will respect our rights, including the right to be fairly remunerated for our work. We will be working together to engage our members to support appropriate  amendments to C-32, the government bill that was given first reading in Parliament on June 2nd.
The Writers’ Union of Canada, the Professional Writers Association of Canada, the Playwrights Guild of Canada, the League of Canadian Poets, the Canadian Authors Association and the Literary Translators Association of Canada will work together through the summer and fall to advise politicians and civil servants on required changes to the legislation under consideration. The six associations represent over 4000 professional writers and translators.
CAA is also participating in a wider coalition led by the Canadian Copyright Institute that includes associations from all the creator sectors. We will be sending you further information about these issues, and we also want your feedback and your concerns. This process is very important to all of us as we hope it will influence the outcome of Bill C-32. We look forward to future dialogue with you. In the meantime, here are some facts about the proposed copyright legislation and how it affects writers and publishers:What’s wrong with Bill C-32?
Canadian writers and other creators will suffer hardship under C-32
The average income of a Canadian writer is only $16,000 – that’s less than minimum wage;Most Canadian publishers operate on very slim margins; their sustainability is often fragile;Canada’s creators and publishers need all the income their works can generate. Their sustainability is threatened when income is taken away;Only some of the income from a book or other copyright protected work is generated when it is sold. Other revenues are earned when instead of buying more copies of a book, a school or other institution reproduces pages of the original. To get permission to make copies without infringing copyright, they purchase Collective Licenses, income from which flows back to creators and publishers just like royalties from sales;By exempting educational users and others from the requirement to get collective licenses, C-32 will cost Canadian creators and publishers as much as $30 million a year in license income alone.C-32 violates core principles of Copyright Law
Copyright exists to protect producers and creators. When others use our works, copyright law should ensure the people who worked so hard to produce them are compensated;C-32 expropriates creators and publishers in the name of the public interest; but no other supplier to the educational sector – whether makers of desks or computers or the teachers in the classroom – are forced to work for free!What you can do to fix Bill C-32:Help ensure Canadian creators are heard. Raise our concerns with your colleagues, in caucus, and in the House of Commons;Build bridges with like-minded members of other parties to protect Canadian creators from unfair and arbitrary expropriation;Protect Canada’s place in the new digital economy by supporting amendments to C-32 that – without hardship to consumers –  ensure Canada’s creators suffer no hardship. Creators of content need to derive benefit from their work. The vitality of Canadian culture in the global digital economy depends on it!”

This is equivalent to a tax on authors in support of the educational system. It reduces the amount governments have to pay for books and other content in different media which their curriculum requires.  It is unfair.

Iran elected to the UN Commission on the status of Women

Canada ‘deplores’ Iran’s appointment to UN women’s rights panel.

I missed this report in May but noticed a reference to it in an article about Sakineh. The leader of Iran likes to go to the United Nations and give his demented speeches. Iran is a country, and I suppose its leader has a right to go to the UN, but for the Assembly to elect Iran, a country in which women are no more than chattels and in which they are subjugated to torture, lashing and stoning, is reprehensible. Our government has spoken out against this travesty. I hope our representative holds Iran accountable at every available opportunity.

Remember Sakineh. Please sign the petition at http://freesakineh.org/

Sakineh

The Globe and Mail reports this am that the stoning of Sakineh may go forward. This was according to the head the Judiciary in Tabriz. As well, a so-called human rights commissioner  “Mohammad Javad Larijani, the head of Iran’s High Council for Human Rights, lashed out against the international campaign to spare Ms. Mohammadi Ashtiani, while pointing out that stoning is rarely used.”

Further we are told that the regime has to hire rentathugs to carry out these appalling sentences. Only countries that treat their women as equal partners in the world can move into the 21st century, in my view. All others are mired in the superstition and brutality of the past.Women of Iran are increasingly educated to university level and make up a high proportion of graduates.How long must they be kept subjugated and treated as male possessions?

http://freesakineh.org/ to sign the petition